Question May 29, 2010: qs_29-May-2010_7654_10901.
Answer May 29, 2010: ans_29-May-2010_7654_10943.
This time, no final decision is given or published by the ECOSOC committee.
Question May 29, 2010: qs_29-May-2010_7654_10901.
Answer May 29, 2010: ans_29-May-2010_7654_10943.
This time, no final decision is given or published by the ECOSOC committee.
7 new items since beginning of 2010:
.qs_29-January-2010_7270_9382.
.ans_31-January-2010_7270_9454.
.qs_05-February-2010_7270_9668.
.note_12-February-2010_7270_9880.
.note_18-March-2010_7270_10119.
.note_02-April-2010_7654_10203.
.Geneva Office’s memo for ECOSOC, April 4, 2010.
As you may see, there is no change.
Our Media Add-tool was out of work, we could no more upload pdf files. Today reparation is made and we can go on. Below what happened since:
UN’s questions on May 22, 2009: qs_22-May-2009_6969_8033
AEHRF’s answer May 27, 2009: ans_27-May-2009_6969_8088
UN’s decision June 2, 2009: note_02-June-2009_6969_8162
UN’s question June 4, 2009: qs_04-June-2009_6969_8269
UN’s reminder note Aug 3, 2009: note_03-August-2009_7270_8309
and AEHRF’s answer Aug 4, 2009: ans_04-August-2009_6969_8349
My clarification:
The Committee asks us political questions, but it is not the role of NGOs to participate in political struggles. We remain on the level of Human Rights abuses. The two links are:
Another pair of 10 questions-answers under the following two links:
and answer-of-03-01-2003-_004.
You may notice that the (already answered) 50 organisation-question is raised again, (remind our answer-of-19-01-02-_0011).
Our answer to ECOSOC Committee’s previous question for clarification belonging to our candidature for the ECOSOC status. Find it with this link: answer-of-19-01-02-_001
A year later the Committee asked exactly the same question. Find it with this link: .re-question-of-09-01-03-_003.